Concubine Raiders

In every era, there will be some prophets, such as Copernicus, who have advanced wisdom and ideas, and most people will be submerged by the environment.

The identity of 11 is similar to that of a prophet, detached from the times. Even if the body steps on the ground, the soul will inevitably alienate from the secular world and form a spectator's posture, which I call unconscious spectator. The essence is the opposition of two different ideological systems. Crossing is a medium, which gives the chance of collision between the two ideas. Under the unconscious bystander posture, 11's level of keeping calm is far higher than the general level. She is more likely to break away from the main position of contradiction and conflict, and get the best choice by overall measurement. Her pity is not only the tolerance of injuring others, but also a concern about the fate of the group. It is not for me to raise 11, but the dislocation of time and space will inevitably bring more acute historical sense to the parties. The cognitive perspectives constructed by Aborigines (Xu Si et al.) and immigrants (11) in the same situation, such as the difference between two and three-dimensional, show a huge difference in plane and three-dimensional.

The essence of social integration is the deconstruction cognition of another system. Her outstanding performance, even can be called perfect, is due to her deep understanding of the nature of the system, "know yourself and know the enemy, and you will be invincible in a hundred battles.". She just needs to be firmly rooted in the essence, in the rules. Similar to Qin Wenqiao's and Qiao's, it's just a practical course to test the proficiency and skill of 11 new knowledge. She dialectically analyzes the advantages of crossing. Plagiarizing poems and imitating modern commodities are just superficial means. The essence of crossing lies in modern people's thoughts and horizons. Not to mention the aunts and wives who were confined to the inner courtyard, Xu Si, who had a wide footprint, high status and much experience, was also limited by the times. We always insist on not knowing the outside world from other people's eyes, insist on independent thinking, and not be easily induced by others, do not follow the same pattern, and do not arbitrarily apply the old pattern.

Yuan Niang, Xu Si and so on are all drowned by the environment. The characters' characters do not appear out of thin air (yuanniang's imitation of the eldest wife and the inheritance of Qiao Liuyu's wife) and are not single line development. They all have a process of gradual enrichment and fullness, which conforms to the characteristics of human society and the times. They are the specific characters in the specific environment, and their human nature is complex. The simple definition of "good or bad" can only be applied to things but not to people. Etiquette, righteousness, benevolence and filial piety are the content of moral evaluation rather than the evaluation mechanism. People choose the foothold of evaluation according to their own position and preference. In Xu Si's eyes, yuanniang is created after balancing his internal moral mechanism. In the eyes of the eldest wife, yuanniang is morally perfect, while in Xu Si's eyes, yuanniang is utilitarian and wrong. To make a deduction, Yuan Niang and Xu Si, assuming that they are in the event, have to go through the following process: analysis - decision - action. Firstly, collect information, analyze the background, trend and significance of the event; secondly, judge the interest relationship and interest tendency, and formulate the action plan; finally, practice and observe the effect. Please note that there is no moral evaluation mechanism in this process. Morality only exists as an available content resource to prove the justice of action or cover up the injustice of action. In other words, morality has no evaluation function in the event, but as the support of the rationality of the event development, it is selected to persuade the relevant people. Once rationality is established, action is considered just and moral. Therefore, yuanniang will not think that she has done wrong, and Xu Si will not be aware of guilt. The rationality of their self-identity has been established and is difficult to break.

From the integrity of the characters, I think it is meaningless to evaluate Xu Si and Yuan Niang's "good or bad" moral evaluation. In the framework of the text, they all have rationality. If we judge the words and deeds of the ancients with modern concepts, we will inevitably have some problems. If we get the moral evaluation of the characters based on this, we will lose the historical position of fair evaluation. Since we are talking about character images, we should return to the original context. Of course, if we want to comment on a certain behavior phenomenon, such as the system of wives and concubines and the difference between the two, there is no original context restriction. In the comparative evaluation of ancient and modern times, morality is absolutely the focus of evaluation.

As for the image of yuanniang, she has not commented subjectively in the article. All the comments are given by the other in the natural development of the plot. After weighing many factors, such as the distance between relatives and relatives, interest disputes and so on, the others get the evaluation of yuanniang. It can be said that all the evaluations in this paper have subjective tendency. At this point, I appreciate the writing attitude and writing skills. Zhizhi hides in the text as a recorder and only looks at it without participating in it. It is a record rather than a narration. It tries to describe it in a faithful and synchronous way with a nearly objective description rather than a reproduction statement delayed after processing the organization. In the story construction, the author tries to avoid the subjective emotional tendency to induce readers. We can freely choose the reading tone, sympathize with Yuan Niang and ignore Xu Si. The maturity of objective and mechanical narrative skills marks the change of writing from low-level personal emotional experience writing to higher-level writing focusing on the survival state of the group. Writing is no longer personal and seeks emotional resonance. Its significance is deepened, vision is broadened and values are expanded, and it begins to show sociality and depth.

There is a common problem in network literature that the text structure lacks authenticity and objectivity. Authenticity does not mean documentary, but refers to the author's position in the text narration. When the reader begins to read, the emotional experience is generated independently, which is a brand-new experience and perception. It is the reader's unique situation representation. Reading presents the characteristics of authenticity because of its privacy and uniqueness. It is said that the author does not use the first person narration in the text, so the author is not in the text. The author's position has nothing to do with personal tone, but is implied in the structure of the text. When readers read, where is the author? As mentioned above, the experience in reading is personal, private and unique. When the experience is obtained, the author is not present. When readers perceive authenticity, they are obviously exclusive: I am on the spot, I am watching, and get the truth from my senses without passing through other people. In the text without authenticity, the author repeatedly strengthens the emotional tendency of the narrator. Besides the characters in the story, the third-party narrator forces are everywhere. At this time, reading is no longer personal and private, and readers can not reproduce the situation alone. Instead, they can only get the public emotional resonance defined by the author according to the author's guidance, and can not get the only exclusive emotional experience.In other words, readers no longer go deep into the text, but directly get the reading experience from the author. The process of obtaining the reading experience through the context reproduction is no longer necessary, which leads to serious consequences: the arrangement and development of the characters' plots lose the meaning and ability to express their thoughts and feelings, conflicts and contradictions are deliberately arranged and exaggerated, which is false and meaningless, and the logic inside the text The development of the story is no longer driven by the logical and rigorous objective contradictions within the text, but depends on the author's subjective will and emotional tendency to choose and arrange it artificially. So, who is reading? What is the basis of reading, what is the value and significance of reading?

I'm a stream of consciousness. I'm a stream of consciousness. I want to write where I want to go. I welcome the correct communication with content, and refuse meaningless accusation and quarrel.

I hope that Zhizhi can persist in refining writing skills and bring us more in-depth words. We should stick to the author's attitude and try to realize the authenticity, objectivity and rationality of art. Although I really want to see one-on-one love fairy tales, I support your attitude. However, it is estimated that you will often see me out of control in the comments section, haha.

Welcome to visit and read. The latest, fastest and most popular serial works are all original at the starting point!