The Greatest Showman

Remember in one second [End of the God Station] Mobile phone user input address: m.xinwanben.com

.,

"Or, to modify the settings in the second half of the forest, should those people support love? Or should they support freedom? How to modify it, I don't have any more ideas for now."

There was so much information in Renly's words. It was like the big bang of the universe. All thoughts were released with a bang, and then the countless information in his mind began to tumble, thoughts. Even with the thoughts, the processing speed can’t keep up—

As if the computer memory is not enough in general.

But Ogus shook his head lightly, "No...no no...it shouldn't be like this..." It sounded rough, Renly's words seemed very reasonable, but after careful consideration, Oguss Having a different idea, he refuses to be led by Renly's nose, "Your whole idea is wrong."

Ogus did not raise his eyes to look at Renly, but immersed himself in his own world, "Your setting and questioning are trying to simplify the story, presenting a single line and single level in a simple and crude way. Therefore, you hope to simplify and clarify those settings. This is not the original intention of the entire play. I hope to present a complex world view. How complex the entire social structure should be, but when The framework system cuts those branches in an unreasonable way, and society is in danger of collapsing."

Gradually, Oggs's thoughts became clear again, he slowly raised his eyes, and looked at Renly brightly, "I need to maintain those complexities, and I also need to maintain those uncertainties. After the film is over, we generate our own ideas and trigger the collision of different thinking, which is also our conscious behavior in the stage of writing the script, and the situations you mentioned are exactly the effects we hope to present.”

"I don't think you understand what I mean." Renly shook his head slightly, he knew Oggs was prejudiced - always thought he was aggressively trying to "pull" him into submission, but in fact Renly was Seriously discuss the script and the characters.

Does he want to be in "The Lobster"? Yes; does he want "The Lobster" to be a great work? Yes. So, if Colin Farrell was the premise of "The Lobster" being a great work, would he? The answer is also yes. He will try his best to get a chance to perform, but he will not stalk.

Now, he needs Oggs to sort out his thoughts.

"You mean, I hope that through this story, people will think differently about social systems, about love, about family, etc." Renly slowed down and said calmly, giving Oggs enough to think about. time.

But Ogus had a puzzled look on his face, staring at Renly with flickering eyes, all vigilant.

This made Renly a little amused and a little helpless. "Oggs, if you think of me as a bad guy and are robbing you of your work, then there is no way for us to continue talking."

Ogus' expression was a little embarrassed, but there was no affirmation or denial, and he just stared at Renly like this - since he is not good at words, then he simply didn't say more.

Renly could only continue to say, "Let's calm down, you want the audience to think about this system, and different possibilities burst out in the intricate relationship, no doubt, this is a very grand idea, but do you realize that, Does your ability not match your ambition?"

Frankly speaking, it stings Oggs - Oggs is best at seeing a side of society in a small pattern. When he leaves the small pattern, he is easily at a loss. "Lobster" is like this, the whole concept is very delicate, but the window presented is vague.

Ogus raised his eyebrows, "I don't think it's necessary. You can evaluate my work, but you shouldn't attack my literacy and ability. I don't think your behavior is laudable."

"Then, you should also show a corresponding attitude. If you can't correct your attitude, then our conversation will never find the result, and I don't think it is necessary to continue. You can look for other actors. I'm very disappointed to appear in this work, but I won't stop it." Renly also corrected his attitude in a rare sight, and said solemnly and sternly.

"You really don't mind?" Ogus seized the opportunity and mumbled, but he couldn't hold back after all, but he regretted the words as soon as he uttered them, because of his impulsiveness and because of his unbearable thoughts." That was not what I meant."

But Renly waved his hand indifferently, "There's no need to apologize. Cooperation requires the will of both parties. If there is any sense of coercion, then things will be meaningless." Then Renly raised his eyebrows.

"I don't think the small size is a disadvantage, Woody Allen spent his life talking about the little things about the middle class in New York, but it didn't stop him from being a great director; Alfred Hitchcock spent his life In discussing love and suspense, but there is no doubt about his excellence. I just think that only when you can clearly understand your ability and talent, and identify your strengths and develop them, can you be called a genius, and those who have more ambition than ability , often ends up capsizing.”

Rarely, Renly showed his sharpness—not against reporters or enemies, but against another talented director.

If it is a director with a hot personality, I am afraid that the table would have been directly turned at this moment; but Oggs did not directly explode, but quietly watched Renly, as if he was savoring these words carefully

Meaning behind slang:

He was uncomfortable - for sure, no one likes hearing those harsh criticisms, and he was no exception. At this moment, Oggs was very uncomfortable, but he did not burst out, but calmed down and began to think. He and Renly were indeed on opposite sides, but at the same time he was in the same situation as Renly: a concerted effort to get the "lobster" story right.

Although he can't be sure whether Renly is sincere, or is calculating himself; but he can't deny that he is full of curiosity about Renly's ideas and concepts - even if Renly criticizes himself "capacity is not worthy of ambition" , he was still curious about Renly's idea of ​​the story and characters.

Taking a deep breath, taking a deep breath again, secretly taking a deep breath, Oggs quietly hid all his thoughts and reactions, "Then, according to what you said, within a small scale, it reflects the whole society's thoughts and feelings. On the other hand, what should we do?"

After all, Oggs settled his mind, lowered his posture, truly stood on an equal footing with Renly, and cut to the point smoothly-at this moment, the discussion about "lobster" really came to a key position.

"Works that present various social conditions rely on the appearance of all beings under one concept. In simple terms, when faced with a murder case, different people have different reactions, and these different reactions reflect different personalities, different families, and different education. , different classes, and finally piece together the whole society.”

Renly said this, paused for a moment, and stared at Oggs. Although he did not get approval, he did not inspire opposition. It can be seen that Oggs has set his mind and really opened his heart to listen to his thoughts, things After finally crossing the first threshold, Renly continued.

"Then there is only one concept of 'lobster' now, which is the murder, but there are no characters. Or, there is no way that these characters can be linked to the whole concept. I'm talking about the role of David, but At the same time, they are two different characters in the hotel and the forest, and it is the woman that David fell in love with at the end."

"Let's look at it this way: the system supported by the hotel, the concept supported by the forest, and the people represented by David and the woman are all derivatives of this social system, and their different personalities and attitudes, It shows a different side of the whole society. But now, all those differences are invisible."

"First of all, the opposing systems of the hotel and the forest are actually the same system, but one supports the family, so that no matter what form of family is supported; the other supports independence, and then no matter what form of union is destroyed, these are two The extremes form the whole distorted situation. There is no problem in itself, as you said, different people in the same context can derive different personalities and states, which is also what the film needs to explore.”

"But now, the script's setting for David and the woman is vague. They can't support the setting of this 'society'. They seem to support the hotel and seem to be against it. It seems that they support the forest and they don't seem to be satisfied. It is an ambiguous setting that cannot be connected with society at all, let alone criticize or reflect.”

"Do you want to present a diverse reflection? No problem, then you must start with the male and female protagonists. How much social influence is reflected in them, then how much the audience can accept. That's why I said , or change the setting of the forest and put it on the opposite side of society, just like the 'Hunger Games', set up two opposites and conflict, then the reflection that the creator expects becomes extremely clear; or change the two The setting of a character, through their choices and decisions, reflects the consequences of the social framework—those deformed results.”

The gushing words really dissect the core idea of ​​the whole story, and then finally come back to the original point: this is the sure reason why Renly proposed the role-not to facilitate his own role, but to establish the whole. The core idea of ​​the story.

Oggs never interrupted, but listened carefully and earnestly, and said without warning, "So have you taken a screenwriting course? Or a directing course?"

"..." Renly also opened his mouth slightly in a rare sight: that's not the point, okay?

Support (end this site) and share this site with those who need it! Can't find the book, please leave a message!